BNB vs Ethereum Name Service (BNB vs ENS)
BNB's market cap is 346× that of Ethereum Name Service ($102.53B vs $295.91M).
Over the past year BNB lost 23.67% and ENS lost 64.75%, so BNB was the stronger performer.
If Ethereum Name Service had BNB's market cap, one ENS would be worth $2,425.78, 347× today's price.
BNB vs ENS performance
| Metric |  BNB |  ENS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $769.68 | $7.00 |
| Market cap rank | #4 | #154 |
| Market cap | $102.53B | $295.91M |
| 24h volume | $859.75M | $21.06M |
| 24h change | 1.16% | 1.41% |
| 7d change | 0.34% | 3.41% |
| 30d change | 11.42% | 20.15% |
| 1y change | 23.67% | 64.75% |
| Circulating supply | 133.16M BNB | 42.27M ENS |
| Max supply | 200M BNB | 100M ENS |
| All-time high | $1,369.99 | $83.40 |
| From all-time high | 43.8% | 91.6% |
The reverse: at Ethereum Name Service's market cap, BNB would trade at $2.22. These figures assume today's circulating supply and are illustrations, not predictions.