If our so-called facts are changing shadows, they are shadows cast by the light of constant truth. So too in religion we are repelled by that confident theological doctrine … but we need not turn aside from the measure of light that comes …

Arthur Eddington
British astrophysicist (1882-1944)
89 pieces
- Lived
- 1882–1944
- Born
- Kendal
- Died
- Cambridge
- Nationality
- United Kingdom
- Known as
- mathematician, astronomer, astrophysicist, physicist
- Era
- 20th century
Read more:Wikipedia ↗Wikiquote ↗Wikidata ↗
Works (89)
You will understand the true spirit neither of science nor of religion unless seeking is placed in the forefront.
The finding of one generation will not serve for the next. It tarnishes rapidly except it be reserved with an ever-renewed spirit of seeking.
Science has an important part to play in our everyday existence, and there is far too much neglect of science; but its intention is to supplement not to supplant the familiar outlook.
We have to build the spiritual world out of symbols taken from our own personality, as we build the scientific world out of the symbols of the mathematician.
If in a community of the blind one man suddenly received the gift of sight, he would have much to tell which would not be at all scientific.
Wherever a way opens we are impelled to seek by the only methods that can be devised for that particular opening, not over-rating the security of our finding, but conscious that in this activity of mind we are obeying the light that is in …
Physical science comes nearest to that complete system of exact knowledge which all sciences have before them as an ideal. Some fall far short of it.
The exploration of the external world by the methods of physical science leads not to a concrete reality but to a shadow world of symbols, beneath which those methods are unadapted for penetrating.
Theological or anti-theological argument to prove or disprove the existence of a deity seems to me to occupy itself largely with skating among the difficulties caused by our making a fetish of this word [existence].
Ninety-nine people out of a hundred have not seriously considered what they mean by the term "exist" nor how a thing qualifies itself to be labelled real.
We do not want a religion that deceives us for our own good.
If God is as real as the shadow of the Great War on Armistice Day, need we seek further reason for making a place for God in our thoughts and lives? We shall not be concerned if the scientific explorer reports that he is perfectly …
However closely we may associate thought with the physical machinery of the brain, the connection is dropped as irrelevant as soon as we consider the fundamental property of thought — that it may be correct or incorrect. … that involves …
The mind has an outlook which transcends the natural law by which it functions.
The laws of logic do not prescribe the way our minds think; they prescribe the way our minds ought to think.
Even if religion and morality are dismissed as illusion, the word "Ought" still has sway.
The essential difference, which we meet in entering the realm of spirit and mind, seems to hang round the word "Ought."
To those who have any intimate acquaintance with the laws of chemistry and physics the suggestion that the spiritual world could be ruled by laws of allied character is as preposterous as the suggestion that a nation could be ruled by laws …
Natural law is not applicable to the unseen world behind the symbols, because it is unadapted to anything except symbols, and its perfection is a perfection of symbolic linkage. You cannot apply such a scheme to the parts of our …
Materialism in its literal sense is long since dead. … It is … belief in the universal dominance of scientific law which is nowadays generally meant by materialism.
What I may attempt is to dispel the feeling that in using the eye of the body or the eye of the soul, and incorporating what is thereby revealed in our conception of reality, we are doing something irrational and disobeying the leading of …
We should not argue with the blind man who maintained that sight was an illusion to which some abnormal people were subject. Therefore in speaking of religious experience I do not attempt to prove the existence of religious experience …
Objections to religious mysticism lose their force if they can equally be turned against natural mysticism.