Quote
"... I am very anxious to save the s from the . I am anxious to save the forests from the . It would be nice if we had a Forest Service. Instead, we have a service. I have had that bias since 1938. I think that it would be helpful if we could switch the timber operations into the and reinstate the Forest Service to be concerned with the entire forest. ... The Forest Service has control over a great deal of wilderness, and it is more concerned about (keeping out) human feet than how many bulldozers, chainsaws, and roads are in it. That’s because it is a timber service. ... We’ve lost a huge amount of forests in this country and globally. Forests are, in large part, the way the earth breathes. We have to become aware of what the wild forest is doing for us: It is releasing oxygen, storing carbon dioxide, taking care of water and soil and habitat, and giving us beauty. The marketplace doesn’t count any of those things into its thinking. We must admire and credit nature’s services. , who teaches at Stanford, wrote a book called , which everyone should read. The gist of the book comes from a separate economics study, which says that something like 34 trillion dollars of nature’s services are used every year. There is no program to pay nature back. Before too long, nature will say your credit is no damn good. That is the part they need to remember about wilderness."
D
David Brower
