Quote
"Modern science was born in the period beginning with Copernicuss work De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (1543) and ending with Newtons Philosophia Naturalis Philosophiae Mathematica."
E
Eduard Jan DijksterhuisEduard Jan Dijksterhuis
Eduard Jan Dijksterhuis
Eduard Jan Dijksterhuis was a Dutch historian of science.
"Modern science was born in the period beginning with Copernicuss work De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (1543) and ending with Newtons Philosophia Naturalis Philosophiae Mathematica."
"In the course of the fifteenth century, the sexagesimal division of the radius, in terms of which cords and goniometrical line-segments were expressed, was generally superseded, though not immediately replaced, by a decimal system of positional notation. Instead, mathematicians sought to avoid fractions by taking the Radius equal to a number of units of length of the form {\displaystyle 10^{n}} {\displaystyle 10^{n}}...The first to apply this method was the German astronomer Regiomontanus... the second half of the sixteenth and the first decades of the seventeenth century... observed of a gradual development of this method of Regiomontanus into a complete system of decimal positional fractions. Yet none of the steps taken by... writers is comparable in importance and scope with the progress achieved by Stevin in his De Thiende."
"The dangers inherent in the twentieth-century classifications of the ‘mechanistic’ are best illustrated by two important works from the early 1960s. Dijksterhuis’ classic work, The Mechanization of the World Picture, traces the history of the emergence of a concept by looking for antecedents of a modern notion of the ‘mechanistic’ in antiquity. His work illustrates the ways in which focus on the different senses of the term ‘mechanical’ affects the questions that are considered. Taking as a given that atomism is a ‘mechanistic’ theory, Dijksterhuis traces the prehistory, in antiquity, of ideas contributing to what came to be called a ‘mechanical’ world-view – the development of mathematical physics and corpuscular materialism – and scarcely considers the contributions made by the discipline of mechanics.6 Tellingly, he downplays the contribution of the machine analogy to the history he is writing, because of its incompatibility with atomism."
"Mechanics... was an axiomatic construction; and... its problem could be solved quantitatively by algebraic methods."
"Plato makes the cosmos a living being by investing the world-body with a world-soul."
"[The mathematical character of Descartes physics lies in its methodological nature, namely, the] axiomatic structure of the whole system, in the establishment of indubitable foundations and the deduction of the phenomena."