Jean-Pierre Serre

"It strikes me that mathematical writing is similar to using a language. To be understood you have to follow some grammatical rules. However, in our case, nobody has taken the trouble of writing down the grammar; we get it as a baby does from parents, by imitation of others. Some mathematicians have a good ear; some not (and some prefer the slangy expressions such as iff). Thats life."

"One day, I had to give a lecture at the Chevalley Seminar, a group theory seminar in Paris. [...] When I got to the room, fifteen or so researchers were there, along with a few students seated in the rear. A couple of minutes before the talk was to start, Serre came in and sat in the second row. I was honored to have him in the audience, but I let him know right off that the presentation might not be very interesting to him. It was intended for a general audience and I was going to be explaining very basic things. [...] At the end of the seminar, Serre came up to me and said—and here I quote verbatim: “You’ll have to explain that to me again, because I didn’t understand anything.” [...] the most troubling aspect was the abruptness, the frankness with which Serre had overplayed his own incomprehension. It takes a lot of nerve to listen closely to a presentation, then go up to the speaker, smile, and tell him that you “didn’t understand anything.” I never would have dared. Why did he do it? I first told myself it must be one of the things you have the right to do when you’re Jean-Pierre Serre. Then I realized that could also work the other way: what if this technique had actually helped him become Jean-Pierre Serre?"

"You see, some mathematicians have clear and far-ranging. "programs". For instance, Grothendieck had such a program for algebraic geometry; now Langlands has one for representation theory, in relation to modular forms and arithmetic. I never had such a program, not even a small size one."

"If Serre was a Mozart, Grothendieck was a Wagner."

"Je pourrais dire, en exagérant à peine, qu’entre le début des années cinquante jusque vers l’année 1966, donc pendant une quinzaine d’année, tout ce que j’ai appris en "géométrie" (dans un sens très large, englobant la géométrie algébrique ou analytique, la topologie et l’arithmétique), je l’ai appris par Serre, quand je ne l’ai pas appris par moi-même dans mon travail mathématique. C’est en 1952 je crois, quand Serre est venu à Nancy (où je suis resté jusqu’en 1953), qu’il a commencé à devenir pour moi un interlocuteur privilégié - et pendant des années, il a été même mon seul interlocuteur pour les thèmes se plaçant en dehors de l’analyse fonctionnelle. - Grothendieck, Récoltes et Semailles."